• Statement from the
    Mendham Borough Board of Education



     

    On Monday, October 30, 2017, the Mendham Borough Board of Education (“Board”) received the Fact-Finding Report from the independent, State-appointed fact-finder regarding the on-going Teacher negotiations.  The Board’s Negotiating Committee has reviewed the report and is recommending that the Board accept the independent fact-finder’s report.

    The Board requests that the Mendham Borough Education Association (“Teachers’ Association”) also approve and accept the fact-finder’s Report, so we can settle the negotiations and move forward.

    The fact-finder’s Report was based on the data and evidence presented by both sides.  The independent fact-finder’s job is to evaluate the data and provide a recommendation for a fair settlement.  The independent fact-finder was approved by both the Board and the Teachers’ Association before the process started.

    If both parties accept the report, then the contract will be settled.  If either party does not accept the report within twenty (20) days of its issuance, the Public Employment Relations Commission will appoint a super-conciliator to further assist the parties.   There is no set time limit to reach an agreement in super-conciliation.

    Again, to bring closure to these negotiations and to settle the Teachers’ contract, the Board is recommending the acceptance of the fact-finder’s report and encourages the Teachers’ Association to do the same.

    Click here for the Fact-Finding Report.

     


    April 26, 2017
     
    Negotiations are always challenging and often difficult—particularly when they are conducted among colleagues and friends and involve matters like compensation for excellent work and the health care benefits that every family needs.  And sometimes unfounded acrimony erupts when the best of intentions collide with the economic realities of budgets and available funds.  That is how the Board chooses to interpret the April 25 Statement from the MBEA.  The Board understands and appreciates the frustration clearly expressed—indeed, it shares that frustration—but that cannot give license to the sort of misrepresentation and outright fabrication the Statement contains.  We write to correct the record.

    The Board has maintained throughout its negotiations with the MBEA that improvements in the salary package for our teachers required that savings be achieved on health care benefits if we are to maintain our budget within the 2% annual cap on increases to the Borough tax levy. The Board had initially wanted the contract to eliminate the most expensive plan offered to MBEA members, leaving many high quality plan options still available. Although the MBEA refused to consider that move, the Board continued to negotiate in good faith and investigated additional ways to achieve the necessary savings. The state-sponsored plan in which the teachers are enrolled today is the most expensive and expansive offered, and was requiring premium increases exceeding 8% annually.  School districts like ours are fleeing that state plan due to its excessive cost and the districts that remain tend to be the highest risk groups that cannot obtain insurance in the private market, exerting even greater pressure on premiums.  But it was not until November that the MBEA expressed even a willingness to consider leaving the state-sponsored plan, and a bit of time and cost was expended by the Board to obtain competitive options.  Nonetheless, in February we presented to the MBEA the option of a move to the Schools Health Insurance Fund, a state-approved Joint Insurance Fund administered by PERMA that insures over 45 New Jersey school districts and affords benefits identical to those of the state-sponsored plan at a significantly lower price.  The MBEA was sent a proposal on March 15 and invited to attend a meeting on April 6 with our insurance broker to describe the new plan and to answer any questions, but it failed to respond, instead waiting until the mediation session on April 19 to make inquiries and raise concerns.  This delay was avoidable, made the April 19 mediation session needlessly protracted, and is entirely attributable to the actions of the MBEA.

    In any event, the Board believed that progress was being made at the April 19 session at narrowing the issues in dispute.  In exchange for an 8.35% increase in salaries over the three-year term of a new contract (a figure exceeding all but one of the most recent contracts entered in local comparable districts), the MBEA consented to enrollment in the Schools Heath Insurance Fund and dropped its demand that members’ contributions to their health care premiums be rolled back and imposed on the District and its taxpayers.  However, the parties reached a snag on a rather unexpected issue—that of a required minimum amount of non-instructional “planning time” to be guaranteed to both the classroom and related arts teachers.  Although the teachers are currently receiving far more, the MBEA was demanding that its contract guarantee from nearly 6 to 8+ hours of weekly non-instructional time be fit within the 36.25 hour work week (in addition to a daily duty-free lunch period plus other “non-student contact” time).  In light of the declining enrollment we are experiencing, however, the Board thought it unwise to so limit the ability of the District to adjust schedules to fit changing needs.  And the MBEA wrongly interpreted our reluctance as a desire to strip them of all “planning time.”  While various proposals were exchanged on this point in the early morning of April 20 and into April 21, the Board determined that negotiations on this final point needed to be concluded before the April 25 public meeting so that any tentative agreement could be considered at that time by the full Board.  Contrary to the MBEA’s representation, the Board’s Negotiations Committee offered to meet on April 21, over the weekend of April 22-23, and again on April 24 in an effort to achieve an agreement.  MBEA declined.  Surprisingly, the April 25 Statement is the first thing we have heard from MBEA since April 20.

    So it appears that we are once again at impasse.

    As frustrating as that may be to you and to us, the Board has no choice but to proceed to the June 14 fact-finding hearing required by state law.  Sometime after that hearing, the appointed fact-finder will issue a non-binding report suggesting how an agreement on a new contract might be structured.  While that report may prove helpful in focusing the parties on possible solutions, the Board remains committed to entering into a contract only if it is affordable to the District and serves the goal of preserving and enhancing the instructional and extra-curricular program offered to our children.  As we said at the beginning of this report, the fine teachers of Mendham Borough are our colleagues and our friends.  The Board wants to compensate them fairly and competitively, but we must also live within our means as do all of you.  When the MBEA is prepared to negotiate with that as a guiding principle, it will find a willing partner in the Board.  Negotiations will doubtless continue to be challenging, but we will get through this.


    Best wishes for a happy and healthy Spring.

    The Mendham Borough Board of Education 
     

     
    January 4, 2017

    Report from the Board of Education on the Status of Contract Negotiations with the MBEA

    As many of you know, the Mendham Borough Board of Education has been involved since last Winter in negotiations with the Mendham Borough Education Association (“MBEA”) over a new employment contract for our District’s teachers.  When informal negotiations reached a stalemate, the Board and the MBEA proceeded to mediation, which also failed to produce an agreement.  The parties are now involved in “fact-finding,” the next statutorily-mandated step in the process of reaching agreement, but success continues to elude us.  There is a reason that this likely sounds familiar to you; the regional high school board and its teachers underwent a nearly identical process just last year.

    The Board remains committed to achieving an agreement that rewards our teachers for the exemplary service that they provide to our children and to our community.  The Board wants to give our teachers a raise in pay—they deserve it--but our ability to do so is severely constrained.  As described in previous communications, increases in general operating costs and state-mandated expenditures constrain the Board’s ability to fund an increase.  More significantly, dramatic increases in health insurance premiums in the state-sponsored plan in which our teacher are presently enrolled have made it impossible for the Board to afford both pay raises and continued enrollment in the same plan while maintaining our current program and remaining within the 2% cap on school tax levy increases.  For that reason, the Board initially offered MBEA members a substantial pay raise (7.5% over a proposed three-year contract, which was subsequently raised by the Board to 8%) in exchange for their agreement to move to the same health insurance plan offered to our District administrators and staff.  The MBEA refused to consider a change in health insurance plans, and instead proposed to make the existing plan more expensive to the Board by capping its members’ contributions.  At mediation in August, the Board again proposed to raise pay (6.3% over a proposed three-year contract), in exchange for a move to a middle-ground, state-sponsored insurance plan that would produce some, but not as much, in premium savings.  Again, the MBEA refused to even consider a change in health plans while demanding a 9.5% increase in compensation.  As we explained at the time, that was well beyond what the Board could responsibly consider.

    So now we are in the midst of the “fact-finding” process.  At some point, a neutral fact finder paid by the Board and the MBEA will release a non-binding report suggesting a resolution.  Regrettably, we are now nearly half way through the academic year and much of the savings we had hoped to achieve in health insurance costs has been spent with the MBEA still enrolled in the legacy plan.  Add to that the fact that we now know that premiums in the state plan will increase starting in January (healthcare insurers price on a calendar year) at a rate even beyond that which was expected and budgeted (8.7% for family coverage vs. 7.6% budgeted), and it becomes clear that the Board’s options are diminishing.  Nonetheless, there is some good news.  The Board is exploring the possibility of achieving savings by moving from a state-sponsored to a private health insurance plan as some other local school districts have recently done.  Our preliminary analysis indicates that such plans can provide comparable or even superior benefits to enrollees at significant discounts compared to the state plans.  The Board raised that possible option at our first “fact-finding” session last month, and the MBEA has indicated a willingness to give it consideration.  This is progress—slight but perhaps significant.   While we don’t have as much money to offer as we did last Winter, the potential savings to be achieved could be used to provide the raise we want to give our teachers, reflecting the changed financial circumstances.

    The Board is now in the process of obtaining price quotes from private insurers so that a specific proposal can be made to the MBEA in advance of our next scheduled session.  The Board remains confident that in the intervening time, our teachers will continue to perform as required under the expired contract with the same enthusiasm and professionalism that they always have and that Mendham Borough rightfully expects.  The Board wishes to make clear to the community that it does not seek to “win” in these negotiations in the sense that someone else must “lose.”  Rather, it seeks to present the best and most competitive compensation package that it can to the MBEA while maintaining the curricular and extracurricular programs currently in place and within the funding presently available.  A contract that achieves those objectives represents the scenario in which everyone “wins.”

     

    Wishing you and your families a Happy, Healthy and Prosperous 2017,

    The Mendham Borough Board of Education

     

     
    September 27, 2016
     
    On August 17, the Board’s Negotiations Committee engaged in a lengthy session with representatives of the MBEA conducted under the guidance of a PERC-appointed mediator. Regrettably, that mediation session did not resolve the differences between the Board and the MBEA over a new teachers’ contract. Discussions were frank, informative and cordial, but ultimately unsuccessful. The mediator intends to report that further mediation would not be productive, and that the matter should be referred to “fact-finding” as provided by New Jersey law.

    It is the position of the Board that, while it is disappointed, there is no blame to be assigned for the current status of contract negotiations. Rather, there is a legitimate difference of opinion regarding the respective parties’ needs and finances. The Board, for its part, continues to pursue the goals outlined in its April 26, 2016 statement, namely:
    1. Maintain and improve the current programs and offerings for our students, as well as the school facilities themselves (which includes maintaining the administration and staff team assembled by the Superintendent to achieve this);

    2. Fairly compensate and reward our teachers for the outstanding service they provide to our students; and

    3. Do all of these things within our budgetary means, including the 2% annual cap on tax levy increases.

    The Board continues to believe that the MBEA shares these goals. But school budgeting is difficult and often unpredictable. Energy prices fluctuate, unfunded state mandates threaten, state aid varies, unanticipated repairs arise and the costs of providing health insurance to District employees increase annually at an alarming rate. In fact, over the last six school budgets, spending on employee health and dental premiums have risen 50% from the 2010-2011 school year. For this reason, the Board has proposed in negotiations that the MBEA accept enrollment of its members in a less costly health insurance plan—the same plan in which the administration and staff team has been enrolled. To be sure, the proposed insurance plan includes higher co-pays and higher out-of-pocket limits, but its acceptance would provide meaningful savings to the District (and to MBEA members, who pay a portion of the premium cost) and dramatically improve the predictability of this enormous cost factor going forward. In exchange, the Board has proposed to substantially increase the salary package for MBEA members. The Board was hopeful, indeed continues to hope, that its approach could form the basis of an agreement on a new contract.

    Under New Jersey law, the Board and the MBEA must now submit to a process known as “fact finding” in which an assigned third party examines the situation, gathers information from the parties and issues a non-binding opinion regarding how the matter should be resolved. That process is somewhat protracted, and the costs of the “fact finder” are shared equally by the Board and the MBEA. Nothing prohibits the parties from continuing negotiations in the midst of that process, and the Board intends to explore that option. In the intervening time, the teachers will continue to perform their duties under the terms of the expiring contract. Our teachers are professional educators of the highest caliber. The Board is therefore confident that no disruption or degradation of the educational process will occur while we continue to work toward a new contract that best serves the District, the taxpayers of Mendham Borough and, most importantly, our children.
     

     
     
    April 26, 2016

    The Mendham Borough Board of Education is currently involved in negotiations with the Mendham Borough Education Association. We are seeking a contract that will allow us to achieve three principal goals:
    1. Maintain and improve the current programs and offerings for our students, as well as the school facilities themselves;

    2. Fairly compensate and reward our teachers for the outstanding service they provide to our students; and

    3. Do all of this within the 2% annual cap on tax levy increases.

    We believe that the MBEA shares these goals. In an attempt to reach agreement on a new contract, the Board's Negotiations Committee has been meeting with the MBEA's Negotiations Committee. Discussions have been professional, cordial and informative.

    Unfortunately, agreement has not yet been achieved. However, both sides agree that the involvement of a third party, a mediator, as provided by law, may prove useful in finding creative ways in which to achieve the three goals described above. This is not an end to negotiations. Rather, it is the start of a new phase of negotiations.

    The Board remains optimistic that, with the assistance of a mediator, an amicable settlement will be achieved that honors our three principal goals.